Seven musts for creating effective elearning

Many new eLearning authors create eLearning with a presentation (PowerPoint) mindset. But creating a course is very different from creating a presentation. This article contains seven tips that will help you to create more engaging and effective eLearning modules. I also created an eLearning module with more background information, There is a link to that full free module at the end of the page.


Define a goal and objectives before you start.  This is the first and probably the most important tip of all. You need to set a goal for your course or assessment! What will your learners be able to do (or know) after they have taken your course. I’ts a must have! Based on your course goal, you can create one or more (learning) objectives.

Do things in the right order. Most people that want to create eLearning will start with writing content and add some questions at the end as an assessment for the learner. This is the wrong way. The problem is that you will get content heavy “PowerPoint like” courses that are not engaging or effective.

The proper order is:

  1. Create your goal and objectives
  2. Determine how to assess these objectives (create the questions)
  3. Create the content, but only the content that you can link to one of the questions.

Your courses will be shorter, more to the point and much more attractive


Tell a story. One of the best ways to involve your users in your course is to tell a story. It is one of the most difficult things to do, but it is also one of the most effective. Books have been written about storytelling, but here are a few tips. It will be almost impossible to create an eLearning course that is completely story based. But you can use the story as an extra. Start your course with the story and come back to it later as an example. A good story will follow these rules/guidelines:

  1. Each story has three main elements:
    1. The introduction of the characters
    2. A problem or conflict
    3. A resolution
  2. Make sure your audience can relate to the story and the characters
  3. Make sure your goal comes back in the plot
  4. Keep it short, attractive and interactive

Smaller is betterbite. In eLearning smaller is better. It is the same as with eating. You don’t put all the food for a week on the table on Monday morning. You divide that in to three meals per day and over the days of the week.

Rule: Don’t make a course or assessment bigger than what people can chew in one session. A 15 to 30 minute course is best.If it is not possible to reach your goal in 30 minutes, split it up. Create a series of courses.

brainBeat the forgetting curve. There is a second reason why you should create small chunks of learning. It allows you to spread the learning experience over time. That is necessary to improve retention. In 1885 Hermann Ebbinghaus discovered that we will forget 90% of what we have learned within hours after learning it. It is the way our brain is wired. In the eLearning module there is more detailed information on this complex but interesting topic.

Use Learning paths. As you have learned by now, it is better to create a series of small field-path-388913_640courses and quizzes instead of creating one big course. The question of course is, how to present this series of learning activities to the learner. The answer is a learning path. It allows you create a series of learning activities, allowing you to create bite sized elements, spread them out over time and build in repetition as well. Easygenerator has the ability to create learning path, but a lot of Learning Management Systems will do that as well.


mistakesLearn from mistakes. When someone makes an error, he has the maximum motivation to learn. You want to correct it. This is something you should use in your eLearning. Use questions in your eLearning not only for assessment, but for a learning purpose. When a learner answers a question incorrect you can show him feedback. Make sure that feedback is accurate and will allow the user to answer the question correct after reading it.  The  rule is:

“Trick your learner in making errors, provide proper feedback and he will learn.”


There are many website with much more details on all of these topics.  I have added them to these tips in a free eLearning module. Feel free to check it out.


People that inspire me: my 5 eLearning heroes

My elearning heroes

Recently I was doing a presentation on eLearning trends. During that presentation I realized that there are just a handful of people driving fundamental change in eLearning. These are the people who really change our landscape and have a big influence on my working eLearning life. So I decided to share these 5 eLearning heroes with you, so you can plug-in to these sources of inspiration as well.

ELearning Hero #1: Jay Cross

Jay Croos in his famous kethup bottle shirt- by  Ignite Gnomedex 2009

Jay Cross in his famous ketchup bottle shirt- by Ignite Gnomedex 2009

Jay is the guy that coined the term eLearning for the first time in 1998. So he is around already for a while. Not only has he been a driver and an advocate for online learning, but he moved beyond. He is also the person that initiated the informal learning movement. His book Informal learning was at least for me the start Informallearning Jay Crossof that. He writes about informal learning at the informl blog. He is the founder of the internet time alliance, a group (Jay Cross, Jane Hart, Harold Jarche, Clarck Quinn and Charles Jennings) that focuses on workplace learning. together they created the great book ‘The working smarter fieldbook’, that is all about workplace learning. You can buy it as a book but they are constantly changing it, you can follow the changes here. So for me if I’m thinking about someone who inspires me in eLearning, it is Jay in the first place. But there is more. He is also a great person. I met Jay for the first time at the Online Educa Conference. He gave a workshop that I attended and we spoke briefly afterwards and exchanged business cards. In 2010 I became CEO of easygenerator, one of the first things I did was writing a mission and vision statement to give clarity to our direction. I was having a lot of doubts on it and decided to mail it to Jay. To my big surprise he did respond and in great detail, it was more than helpful. I was so impressed. He is not only a great inspiration but also a great person. To get inspired, check out this video where Jay is talking about Informal learning.

ELearning Hero #2: Michael AllenMichael Allen

Michael Allen is also someone who is around for a long time, but as with Jay he doesn’t stick to his old ideas, he is an innovator and a driver for change from the very first start of his carreer (he was the man behind the very first authoring tool ‘Authorware’.)  Michael is also one of the leading alleninstructional designers in the world. He fights against boring and bad eLearning and does that in a very constructive way. He wrote a ton of books, all of them are classics and must reads.  He is the CEO of Allen interactions, in my mind one of the leading instructional design firms. His book ‘Michael Allen’s guide to e-Learning’ will cover all the basics on eLearning for you but  I can recommend reading all his other books on instructional design as well. But there is more to Michael. His fight against boring and bad e-Learning. He is one of the instigators of the Serious eLearning manifesto but he is also the founder samof ZebraZaps. ZebraZaps is a tool that will enable you to create all kind of interactive elements for your eLearning, and it is one of the truly innovative tools out there. There is nothing like it. But that is not all. He is also the one that made agile e-Learning development main stream with his book Leaving ADDIE for SAM.  ADDIE is the ‘old’ approach of building eLearning through the so called waterfall model, Sam use agile principles that come out of the world of software development.  And as with all his books it is very practical, it is not just theory, but he shares a lot of practical stuff based on his vast experience. I wrote a book review on this one. Read this interview with Michael Allen, it is a great way to get to know him and his ideas better and to get inspired by him.

ELearning Hero #3: Cathy Moorecathy moore

Cathy Moore is the only one of my heroes that I haven’t met in person, but that does not mean that she inspires me less. As Michael she is an instructional designer that fights boring eLearning. But with a very different approach. Cathy came up with the action mapping approach back in 2008. The approach is very simple but has a huge impact on learning and my thinking about learning. There are four principles:

  1. Identify the business goal
  2. Identify what people need to do (instead of need to know), translate them into actions
  3. Design a (real world) activity for each action that help people practice each behavior
  4. Identify what people really (really?) need to know, add that information

action-mappingThe first big thing is that she connects learning to the business goals, and with that she helps to integrate learning into the business. The second thing is that she points out that learning is about changing behavior, it is about what people do, not what they know. Also a game changer. I wrote several blogs on her ideas because her ideas may have the most direct impact on my work. To get inspired check the action mapping blog and read this interview with Cathy.

ELearning Hero #4: Bob Mosher and Conrad Gottfredsonmosher-gottfredson

I could not decide between them, so I marked them as hero #4 together. They do work at the same company together as well. Our eLearning world is changing rapidly, Workplace learning, retention, performance support and more are all developments that have a big impact on eLearning now and in the near future. It is a real Performance supportstruggle to juggle all these balls. Bob and Conrad came up with a very comprehensive approach that combines all these things and gives you clear guidance in how to make that work. I attended last year a session by them at the Learning Solutions conference that was really an eye opener for me. The have a solution for the ‘Forgetting curve, and they found a way to give you guidance in workplace support as well with their 5 moments of learning needs. I wrote about their ideas Performer support logoseveral times in this blog so check that out for more detail. To make it even more practical they run the performance support community. The best way to get inspired by them is to join that community. It is by invitation only. If you want in, drop me an email @ and I will invite you to this community.

ELearning Hero #5: Aaron SilverAaron

Aaron is probably the least famous person of this list, but he is very likely the guy that will have the biggest impact on learning for the next decade. Aaron is the driving force behind TinCan, now


called the XAPI. For more than a decade eLearning was confined in the bounderies of your LMS. We needed (outdated) standards to run our course in a LMS and track results from our learners. To make things worse we also had competitive standards (Scorm and AICC). Aaron is the guy that changed all that. XAPI is a real revolution for learning. First of all it is about tracking and tracing experiences not just formal learning outcomes, that is a big one. The second thing is that it xapiallows tracking and tracing from anywhere (also mobile devices). Freeing us from the tight boundaries of the LMS and opening up a whole new range of possibilities. Third is that it is personal, you can track and trace your experiences and you can decide what or when to capture. It opens up the possibility to build a personal learning and development portfolio, and a lot more. In fact it is so new, that we all still struggle to wrap our headS around it and come up with applications that use XAPI to its full potential. On top of that he also managed that both SCORM and IACC will merge into a new standard CMI5, based on XAPI. It will enable the tracking and tracing of formal learning in a unified way as well, with all the benefits of this new open standard. Get inspired by Aaron and read this interview with him.

Shocking outcomes from ATD research on Instructional design

The ATD published a report on Instructional design: “Instructional design now: a new age of learning and beyond”. They did a survey among 1120 learning professionals. I find outcomes of this report shocking. For 92% the most popular tool is traditional classroom training, and only 38% believes that they meet their learners needs. Here is their info-graphic.


Info-graphic by ATD on report: instructional design now

Some more detail from the report:

Top 10 approaches in Learning:

  1. 92% – Traditional classroom instruction
  2. 77% – Assessments
  3. 70% – LMS
  4. 70% – Blended learning
  5. 69% – In person coaching
  6. 66% – Structured on the job training
  7. 65% – Courseware authoring tools
  8. 65% – Synchronous learning systems
  9. 63% – In-person mentoring
  10. 61% – Asynchronous learning systems

All this is really old school stuff. No social learning, no informal learning, nothing about connecting learning to the business. 35% does not even use an authoring tool at all. Are the still using pen and paper? I knew that the Instructional Design community is not the most innovative community, but I was unpleasantly surprised with these outcomes.

Another interesting list is the challenges instructional designers face.
At number 1: 41% of the respondents indicates that the lack of leader support is their main challenge. Another clear sign that learning is still not integrated at all in the business side.
Number 2 is lack of skills and competencies (40%), a shocking 40% believes that the are not able to do their job in a proper way! There probably is a relation with the fact that 38% doesn’t have any qualification in eLearning or instructional design at all.
Funding, measuring of effectiveness, technologies and keeping up with developments are among the other top 10 challenges. But number 10 is really interesting again: 16% of the respondents indicates they are challenged by the loss of control due to the success of informal learning. This indicates to me that informal learning is happening despite the L&D department and that they see it as a threat, instead of an opportunity they should embrace.

But the most shocking figure for me was that 38% of respondents believes that they meet their users needs. This means that 62% believes that they are not doing a good job. Meeting the learners needs is a basic requirement. Improving their skills and behavior so that can contribute more to the business goals is the real goal. It does say in the report that almost half of the respondents do believe that they have a positive impact on business goals. But that still means that almost 70 of the respondents believe that what they do is of no importance to their organization! And more than 50% believes that what they does not have any impact on their organizations goals.

I gave my summary post after the last DevLearn conference in Las Vegas the title ‘The gap is widening, we are in a crisis‘. The reason for that was that I noticed an increasing distance between the speakers at the conference and the audience. I did have some doubts about that title. I thought that maybe I was exaggerating it a bit. But after this report I would say:

The canyon is widening: We are in a crisis!

You can download the white paper or book at the ATD (The white paper is free for members, $ 19.99 for non members)

2012 in retrospective: top 10 posts

It is the time of the year to look back and to make plans for the new year. In this post I will have a look at 2012 based on the top 10 post of this blog. The top 10 is:

  1. A new metaphor for e-Learning
  2. Food for thought: 50 Educational thinkers
  3. Why Easygenerator will launch a free edition of her authoring software
  4. A new metaphor for e-Learning: learning maps
  5. Agile E-Learning development
  6. Day 2 mobile learning conference #MLearncon: Trends day
  7. How to keep formal e-Learning relevant
  8. New SCORM standard: I (Actor/Agent) Did (Verb) This (Activity) #TinCanApi
  9. Blackboard buys Moodle partners: open source?
  10. (New) e-Learning metaphors: cased based learning


There are three post in this list (on 1, 4 and 10) about a new metaphor for eLearning. A generic one, one on learning maps and one on cased based learning. I do believe that this is a topic that will be big in 2013 as well. We need to find more effective ways to present our learning content to our learners and that means we have to move away from the current ‘book’ and ‘slide show’ metaphors.

50 educational thinkers. A real great series of posts by Donald Clark. I learned a lot, not only by his selection of thinkers but also by his great summaries of their central thoughts.

The launch of our free edition was big for easygenerator (number 3). A new step in easygenerators endeavor to change e-Learning. We are now live with the free edition for two months and are now approaching the 1500 users mark in over 80 countries. That is something that exceeded expectations. Will be interesting to see what will happen in 2013.

Agile e-Learning development. I’m happy that this post is in the top 10. I think the waterfall model and ADDIE have to many limitations. I believe a better way is the agile approach that comes from software development. An other interesting development here is Michael Allens SAM, an agile methodology for eLearning development. On his corporate blog is an interview with him on SAM. We need to move away from ADDIE and SAM might be the way.

My post from the mobile eLearning conference on trends also made the top 10. Well mobile (both smart phones and tablets) is a game changing trend by itself and that day at MLearncon was a very educational day for me. Also the first post where I used my mind map notes. In 2013 there will be a lot more on mobile and on mind maps.

How to keep formal learning relevant. Our world is changing and we have to change too to keep relevant. This is a trend that will be even bigger in 2013, TinCan wil come and will really be a game changer: I can’t wait. Both subjects are in the top 10.

The post on Blackboard is a representative of another trend: consolidation. We will see match more take overs in 2013, Not always for the best, but it will happen more and more, it is a sign that our industry is growing up.

I’m happy to see that this blog is growing (almost 250% up in comparison to 2011) although that is not my goal. My blog remains mainly a place for me to put done notes and thoughts, but it is nice that people appreciate this. I wish you all the best for 2013 it will be an exiting year for everybody in the e-Learning community and I will keep writing about it.

Blogging about #DevLearn

I will be leaving for Las Vegas in less than one hour, visiting the eLearning Guilds annual conference. I will try to post a daily blog about my findings. I’m really looking forward to it, last year was great. Great keynotes, interesting concurrent sessions, lots of good conversations and contact and the official launch of easygenerator in the United States. This year looks very promising, I like the line up, attendance will be at a new record (approaching the 2000) and we will launch our free edition. Enough to look forward to.

Some figures
As I said attendance will be close to 2000, but there are more interesting figures to share with you:

10.580 – 6573
The number of kilometers/miles I will travel in the next 21 hours.

6/43 – 28/82
The temperature in the Netherlands (Celcius/Fahrenheid) and the temperature in Las Vegas. From drizzling rain and wind to Las Vegas sunshine!

Easygenerator’s booth number at the expo, please come and check us out.

The number of my concurrent session on Business objectives and Learning Objectives. (Wednesday @ 1.15 PM)

The time (AM) I will present the free edition of easygenerator at the Management Exchange Stage. I will present both on Wednesday and Thursday.

559 – 48
The number of users of our free edition (559) and the number of countries it is being used (48). We are very happy with this numbers. We quietly pre-launched our free edition prior to DevLearn to make sure we could build it up slowly and monitor it closely, in order to ensure a perfect authoring environment. But having 559 users in 48 countries in three weeks time, is clearly beyond our expectations.

Enough numbers, my next post will contain more content and stories and less figures.

Social networks

Social networks  are becoming more and more and important part of every day life for me.  Probably nothing special, I’m not really an early adapter when it comes to this.  But it is really becoming a main stream thing. I’m using several tools at this moment. At Stoas we have an Sakai environment to support our projects, we use a wiki and a blog to log all our technical data, I use Twitter (a little).  At Stoas we use Yammer (an incompany Twitter),  I use Moodle to take part in discussions of the Moodle partner network, I write this blog and I use Linked in. And most important customers are starting to ask serious questions about this theme and we are doing some interesting projects using Moodle/Mahara/Elgg.

One of the most important networks for me is LinkedIn. It is really beginning to pay of.  I’m using it to:

  1. Have one central point with all my information
    I have a background in content management, I want to store information once and Use it many times. My about Kasper page in this blog only contains a link to my LinkedIn page.
  2. Get introduced to people I want to meet.
    If I’m looking for someone there is usually somebody in my network who is connected to the solution.
  3. Find people to work for us
    We recently posted for the first time a job on linked in (Interim IT manager), I got over 100  responses and more important we found the right guy.

But I’m a true believer of blended solutions, so my conference phone, WebEx meetings, Skype and DimDim sessions and face to face meetings are still a very important part of my tool set. I don’t think that will ever change.

QMlive: The way software should be

One of the roles I have at Stoas is the role of Product manager for Questionmark Perception.  I have that role since I started working for Stoas, three years ago. John Kleeman started Questionmark some 20 years ago, building the first version at his kitchen table. John by the way is one of the most special people I know and someone I greatly admire. Over the past twenty years Perception grew out into the world leading software for assessments. I don’t know the exact numbers but they are quite impressive. Stoas is representing Questionmark in the Netherlands for more than 10 years and we have over a 100 customers using Perception intensively. It is our most important product, both in number of customers, sold services and overall revenues.

Questionmark is a ‘standard’ software company building proprietary software. We had version 4.2 in 2007, 4.3 in 2008 and version 5 in 2010. The software is improving with each version. Version 5 for example is a complete rebuild of the delivery part of the software (their crown jewel) but …. it took them three years. I understand that, you have all kind of legacy systems, installed bases, tons of software code to rewrite et cetera. But it is the old kind of software development. Let’s say it isn’t an agile approach. But Questionmark is learning and changing. An example of that is their new service for Subject Matter Experts (SME). It is called Questionmark Live! and it’s a light webbased tool to develop questions, aiming at subject matter experts and I became a fan instantly.

QMlive authoring process

Why is it so special?

Questionmark appointed a new guy (Jim Farrel) and made him responsible for QMlive  and gave him a small team of developers. They created rapidly the first version of  a simple authoring tool and put it live in April 2009 as a service for all Questionmark customers. Unlimited and for free! As a good cheap Dutchman that’s the first thing I like. If you have a support contract on the Perception software, you can use it. Even if you just have 5 licences for authors, you still have access for an unlimited number of QMlive authors.

It’s great software. Jim and his team are building beautiful software. The facilities they have created for versioning and sharing are excellent, exactly what I wanted them to be, and maybe even more important it has a really great and intuitive interface. Anybody can create and share question with no training at all!

It’s fast and agile. Jim and his team are constantly updating and expanding the software. On average there is an update every two weeks. They can do that because all the software is on Questionmark servers. Not only are they adding new features but they are listening very closely to the user demands and giving them what they ask for.

It’s multilingual. They created a facility to translate the tool online. I am the volunteer for the Dutch translation. If they put a new version live on Friday, I will translate that on Saturday and it will be instantly available in Dutch. Of course sometimes I mistype a word or make an other mistake. But then I will get an email from a customer and  I can change it on the fly. I like this way of working.

It’s very successful. Our customers like it. We started in April 2009 with no users at all, in September we had 560 unique Dutch visitors creating 5000 questions. In January we had over 1500 unique Dutch visitors, creating over 13.000 questions.  This is an average of 15 users per customer! Incredible numbers and great fun that you can monitor the success in this way. By the way, this makes the Netherlands the second largest user of this service worldwide, only the preceded by the United States. That makes me proud as a Dutch fan.

It is the future. Software like this and the way it is created and offered will be the future. I complement Eric Shepherd and his team for having and following this vision. It will ensure that Stoas will still be a proud Questionmark partner in ten years time.

Curious? You can test this software yourselve, ask for a demo account. Just click here for more info.

Output management

I am writing  a series of post on my professional foundations both for (e)learning  and managing. This is the second blog in that series and it is about  ‘output management’, my management foundation.

In 1998/1999 I followed a training called SVO (an abbreviation for – in Dutch- Steering of change in organisations) at SIOO in the Netherlands. I took away a lot from that course. For example I still have an ‘Action learning group’ that originated from that training. This training transformed me from a consultant into a manager. It was composed of ten three-day sessions in a far to expensive hotel.  Each session was managed by our course manager (Jaap Boonstra, now dean at SIOO) and there was a ‘special guest’, somebody from the field of (change) management.

One of the guest teachers was Filip vandenDriesche. He is the author of the book ‘Leidinggeven zonder bevelen’ , that translates as ‘Leading without commanding’,  it was originally published under the title ‘De input- output manager’.

This book became my management bible. I will explain why. The following picture shows an important concept of the book:

Image form ‘De input- output manager, Filip VandenDriessche.

There are two contradicting pyramids. The “management funnel”  and the “conflict pyramid’. Both cover to three stages (strategic, tactical and operational). On the strategic level (problem and goal) the chances of conflict are small, but if you have a conflict it runs deep! On a tactical level (criteria) the chances of conflict are increasing but on a operational level the chances on a conflict are the biggest. Therefore Filip concludes the following: A manager should be authoritarian on the strategic and tactical level. But on an operational level manager should accept any solution that meets his criteria. In other words keep away from the ‘how’.

Of course there’s more to it, a shared vision is a prerequisite and the person(s) who will create the solution must acknowledge the problem. Pilip has a very simple strategy for that, he calls it ‘how to sell a monkey’. If you have a problem as a manager, then the monkey is ‘on your shoulder’.  You need to get the monkey on the shoulder of your coworker. Just take the following steps:

1. Confront the person with irrefutable examples.

2. State that this isn’t acceptable,

3. Ask the opinion of your coworker and wait.

If the coworker acknowledges your opinion you can actually feel the monkey jump from your shoulder and land on his. This last picture sums it all up.

Image form ‘De input- output manager, Filip VandenDriessche.

For me his book was the most practical management book I have ever read, I can recommend it to everyone. I contacted Filip before writing this blog, he told me that a translation in English  will be available in the next few months. He will publish this on his website:

The most beautiful office in the world!

This week I visited Giunti Labs, we represent them in the Netherlands and Belgium.  They have beautiful products (LearnExact, Hive, EPMS) but their office is even more beautiful and the location is spectacular.

We flew from Eindhoven to Pisa. From there we took the train to Sestri Levante where the office is located. On our way to Sestri Levante we made a stop in Varnazza, one of the 5 villages of cinque terra. Of course it was of season so all restaurants and bars were closed.

We managed to buy a slize of pizza and a beautiful wine. We had our late lunch outside on the town square/harbour. That’s my idea of teambuilding and really not a bad way to spent a sunday afternoon. I had been here before but of season with 4 colleagues is a different experience, I can recommend it to every one.

After this you know that this had to be the highlight of the trip. But then we arrived in Sestri Levante, an other beautiful  town. The town is located ad the Mediterranean Sea and has two bays: Baia delle Favole, (Bay of the Fables), and Baia del Silenzio, the (Bay of Silence). The bay of silence is famous because Marconi did his first Morse experiments from this bay.

In the middle is the oldest part of Sestri Levante  located on a peninsula, with the bays on each side. This images was actually our view from the hotel we stayed in (Vis a Vis). The Giunti Office is located on the peninsula at the bay of silence, and they have the most beautiful building.  It is an old  monestery.


Not bad at all, and quite different from our own office.

Oh, by the way. We met great people,  had an excellent sales training, got some ideas that will probably will change Stoas forever. But I might write about that later. For now I just want to thank Carin, Federico, Fabrizio and all the others for a great and inspiring visit.


Learning landscape, learning framework

I want to write a series of post on my professional foundations both for (e)learning  and managing. This blog is about the foundation we have at Stoas for our learning solutions. Another blog will be about ‘output management’, my management foundation. There will be probably be some more.

One of my tasks at Stoas is to create and maintain a learning framework. Stoas is a leading supplier of learning tools in the Netherlands, with tools like Questionmark Perception and Blackboard. We want to move from a supplier role to a role where we are a learning solution partner.  In order to do that we need to create learning solutions that are based on a coherent framework; solutions often consist of more than one tool.

In order to get away from the ICT perspective we first came up with a Learning landscape; an image of the learning process. As a matter of fact there are two processes; Learning and the development of (e)learning materials.

After that all we need to do was to select the correct tools and connect the tools using standards.

Learning landscape

Learning framework

As you can see Stoas doesn’t have specific tools for managing and planning. Tools like Sumtotal, Plateau and Saba. These tools are more about managing the process and data and not about actual learning. We decided that that is not what we are best in, therefore we don’t sell these tools.

We want to be able to realize learning solutions based on  proprietary software,  on open source software or of a mix of both.

We are constantly evaluating the tools in our framework, this leads to changes. Stoas was a Sakai partner, but we were not successful in selling and implementing it, so we decided to stop with Sakai. We added Mahara to our framework and  became the official Mahara partner for the Netherlands. At this moment we are looking into tools like ELGG and Dimdim. We might add  them to our framework.

There is a lot to be said about this framework. Does it make sense, is it complete, is it logical? Who has another (better) framework?  What are the differences in a framework for educational institutions and corporations? How does this framework really connects to the workplace (through EPSS?). How does it relate to life long learning? I hope to get some responses on these issues. If people are interested we might start a discussion group on this topic.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,096 other followers

%d bloggers like this: