The future of e-Learning, according to Kasper Spiro


Two weeks ago, I wrote a blog about starting up my work as CEO for EasyGenerator. At the end of the blog I concluded that we needed to come up with a coherent vision and mission to determine the direction of future developments of EasyGenerator as a solution and as a company. Inspired by my visit to the development team, I will take the cow by the horns (I am not sure if that is a valid English expression). Therefore, here is the first raw concept version of “The future of e-Learning, according to Kasper Spiro”.

Let’s first look at where we are and how we got there.

e-Learning started out as digitized versions of courses, the so-called page-turners. We published them on CD-ROM’s as Computer Based training (CBT). Later on, we moved these courses to the web and we promoted them to Web-based training (WBT). Over a little more than a decade this developed into more mature forms of e-Learning. With the use of new media like video and flash animations we made e-Learning more attractive and interactive. But main stream e-learning is in most cases still a page turner with some nice interactive snacks in the middle. We created standards like Scorm that gives us some interchangeability and the possibility to track and trace progress and results. Nevertheless, in essence the courses have not moved forward that much in comparison with the original CBT’s.

We now have tools like Moodle (a virtual learning environment), they add extra dimensions to e-Learning. Social constructivism principles are at the fundamentals of Moodle. Therefore, it is about collaborative learning. It offers learners facilities like a forum, blogs and wiki’s to share knowledge and to experience the learning process together. A WBT is often part of such a course.

The feeling is that we are now on the verge of a new phase in the development of e-Learning. At the moment there are a ton of words buzzing around: Web 2.0, Virtual worlds, Informal learning, learning on the job, lifelong learning, collaborative learning, adaptive learning, blended learning, game based learning, skill based learning, communities of practice, et cetera. What is the trend in all this, where are we going?

Let us take a step back first. A few months ago, I met with to Joachim Levelt (the Dutch Education Sales Manager of Apple in the Netherlands) and we had an interesting discussion. He mentioned  Dr. Ruben Puentedura’s SAMR Model of the Technology Adoption Life Cycle. The theory states that all innovation and development goes through four phases.

Substitution. Technology acts as direct tool substitute, with no functional change.  Example: Word processor used like a typewriter.

Augmentation. Technology acts as direct tool substitute, with functional improvement. Example: Basic functions (e.g., cut and paste,  spell checking) used.

Modification. Technology allows for significant task redesign. Example: Integrated with email, spreadsheets, graphing packages.

Redefinition. Technology allows for the creation of new tasks,previously inconceivable. Example: Integrated with work group and content management software.

Source of  theory Ruben R. Puentedura

I will try to map these phases to the development of e-Learning to see where we are right now.

Substitution. At first, we created page-turners (CBT and WBT), in fact they add no real  extra possibilities other than the books and courses we used to have before that. It is just a change of medium.

Augmentation. Then we started to add extra value. We added assessments to see if the learner learned his lesson well. We created Scorm (an e-Learning standard) so we were able to track and report on the learners’ progress and results. We build smart structures like cases to let people start experiencing instead of letting them read knowledge facts.  We use media like sound, video and flash animations to create more interactive courses. All things we did not have in the first phase.

Modification. Switching to the web created the possibility to let people collaborate and learn together and create extra content of their own. By using the outcome of assessments, we are able to present (more) relevant learning materials, thus making the learning more adaptive. We have set our first steps on the path of game based learning and virtual worlds in order to offer learning in a more attractive way and let people experience more instead of just reading the lesson. Exiting developments but a lot of work and very expensive to create.

We are clearly in the modification phase with e-Learning, we have not yet started redefining (e-)Learning. Are we ready to take learning to the next level? I have some images of the future developments and outlooks. I do not know if they are part of this next step or that they just will be enhancements the adaption phase. For now, I just will share these images with you.

  1. One of the main attributes of e-Learning in the first three phases is the fact that learning is a one way street. It goes from learning author to the learner. The learner can only consume the material. In the adaptation phase, learners can contribute themselves to the learning process by collaborating and creating content of their own (in blogs, wiki’s and forum); the so called user generated content. But it is still a one way street, there is no connection between the source content and this user generated content. At the end of the course all this content vaporizes and disappears into thin air. If we succeed in capturing this user generated content and make it stick we can start to create a two way street. E-Learning content then will come to live.
  2. Adaptive e-Learning as we know it now is the first step to more dynamic content. At the end of (a part of the) course you take an assessment and based on the outcome you are directed to another part of relevant content. I call this the “if then else adaptive learning”. It is an important step because you no longer have to go through content about topics you already know.  But this needs to become much more dynamic and effective, we need to make true adaptive e-Learning. Where an individual learning path will develop itself instead of a predefined path set by an author.
  3. If we publish content in a Learning management system the published content is most of the times separated from the source (often wrapped in a scorm package). The only useful feed back we get is a fail or pass notice from an individual learner. If you change the content or add new or improved information at the source (in your authoring system) this has no effect on the published content, you have to republish everything again. This is very ineffective and it prohibits the learner from having the latest and most accurate information.
  4. Formal learning is now separated from our daily work. You go to a class or a on line course (and stop working), you learn, you come back and you will try to incorporate what you have learned in your daily work. You must try very hard not to forget what you have learned, because of the fact that you can’t apply it directly (that is what makes it stick). Studies show that already 80% of what we learn is informal learning. If we succeed in creating learning experiences in the context of your daily working and learning activities, it will be much more efficient and effective.

What is the common denominator in this; I think it is about dynamics and content: feeding back user generated content, create true adaptive e-Learning with true adaptive content, make publications dynamic instead of rigid and make learning content context aware. As I see it the old paradigm used to be ‘Content is king’. I think that authoring environments like EasyGenerator must facilitate the process of designing, creating, publishing, evaluating, redesigning, recreating and republishing the content that is the core of all these developments. In other words: Dynamic content will be king.

If we succeed in this, I can see learning truly merging with our daily work. You don’t follow a courses with a beginning or an end. You follow learning information on a subject that will grow and change, so you will keep on learning. There will be effective ways to share your knowledge and learning systems will present us with the correct information, just enough and just in time.

Comments

  1. Hello Kasper,

    I curiously read your blog. To post u true comment, I should think and rethink your post more thouroughly. I don’t have time for that at the moment. At one point in your story I can’t resist to correct a nasty simplification.

    You say: “e-Learning started out as digitized versions of courses, the so-called page-turners. We published them on CD-ROM’s as Computer Based training (CBT).”

    Since I have a pretty long career in developing e-learning courses, I can assure you that early e-elearning courses could be – and were! – highly interactive learning programs, in which video was used interactively (remember cd-interactive?). When the (early) internet became dominant as the e-learning medium, cd-roms no longer could be used, and because of the very limited bandwith at the time e-learning had te be reduced to text-and-thumbnail pages (Powerpoint in the lead). That (internet!) was the start of the so called page turners.

    That’s all for the moment.

    Leo van den Munkhof

  2. I think your overlooking a major factor in the whole process and that is that the company (I assume that in this article you refer to e-learning at the workplace) has to facilitate and motivate the users can actively take their role in the whole e-learning process and embed the e-learning in their work process . There are within a company always people who are open to new processes, but unluckily the majority of are laid back, disinterest or simple don’t have the time to actively take part in the whole process . There is an important role for the management to facilitate this and for the SME/Teacher/ Moderator to start the fire and to keep the fire burning with the support of all individuals. In the long term, I think, this will become much easier with the shift to new generations who grew up with social networks, penetrating the workforce.

  3. Hi Hans,

    I reckoned I would get a reply from you, after all you are the guy who is introduced at the online educa as Hans ‘open source’ de Zwart. But seriously I haven’t looked into the open source models you mentioned. I will do that, I’m sure we will follow up on this discussion.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stefanie Moerbeek, Kasper Spiro. Kasper Spiro said: New blog: The future of e-Learning, according to Kasper Spiro: http://wp.me/pJsUl-3I [...]

  2. [...] с первоисточника НравитсяБудьте первым, кому понравилась эта [...]

  3. [...] In other words dynamic content will be king. See my personal blog for more detailed information on this vision. [...]

  4. [...] my professional why is more complex. I already wrote my vision blog on e-learning, I thought it had a lot of why elements in it: I believe that we should bring the [...]

  5. [...] Overall I got confirmation on my ideas where e-Learning will be going. In my ‘vision‘ post I  addressed a number of issues. I saw and heard all of them back in Orlando, except [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,064 other followers

%d bloggers like this: